|
Participants include people
involved in literacy and health projects from across Canada, the US and abroad.
If you are planning to attend, send your form and payment before May 15 to
qualify for the early registration fee. |
|
Pilot project on plain
communication |
| The Centre is working on a pilot project on
plain communication with Elizabeth House, a Montreal agency that provides
residential support for single mothers with limited resources and education. It
includes parenting instruction and a schooling component to give the women a
foundation for further learning or work. Through this project, The Centre will
help the agency conduct a literacy audit, do staff training on plain
communication, and consult on revisions to their documents following the audit
and training workshops. We will collaborate with Elizabeth House staff in
developing an evaluation process to measure impact on organizational function,
including client satisfaction. Our intention is that this project can offer a
model for other small social service or health agencies. |
|
|
| What counts as evidence in research in adult literacy,
ABE,and ESL? |
A conference focusing on
this question was hosted by the recently-formed UK National Research and
Development Centre on adult literacy and numeracy (NRDC). With the growing
demand internationally for accountability, and the recognition that adult
literacy has a small body of recognized research, there is new investment in
research in many countries. Questions range from understanding the nature of
adult learning to effective ways of teaching; from ways of measuring levels of
need to measuring levels of progress; from analyzing social context to
measuring economic consequences; to name only a few of the areas of current
inquiry. The NRDC invited researchers from several countries to discuss the
different sorts of questions being asked, the methods being used and the
evidence being produced. A key issue was whether a hierarchy of research
methods that favours scientific empirical measures is necessarily the one best
suited to the issues raised in adult literacy and numeracy. This meeting was
the beginning of what has to be a continuing debate in the field because when
funders decide what counts as evidence, our research and ultimately our program
dollars will flow from there.
Watch for the next issue
(17.1) of Literacy Across the CurriculuMedia Focus for a detailed report
on presentations from the NRDC conference.
Anti-bullying: best practices and test sites A request
for submissions |
The
Canadian Public Health Association (CPHA) is undertaking a project with Justice
Canada to identify criteria and evaluation tools for best practices in
anti-bullying programs. Beginning September 2003, CPHA will be testing a
standardized evaluation tool developed and based on the research of best
practices. If you are interested in participating in developing national
standards for anti-bullying programs, submitting a program description, being
interviewed and/or testing an evaluation tool contact Project Coordinator,
Perpetua Quigley (See coordinates below).
What is
requested?
- Program descriptions
that include an evaluation component and demonstrate effectiveness in reducing
bullying behaviours and responding to the needs of victims.
OR
- Telephone interviews
with administrators of anti-bullying programs that include an evaluation
component and demonstrate the program's effectiveness in reducing behaviours
and responding to the needs of victims.
OR
- Sites for testing an
anti-bullying evaluation tool
Submissions are
requested by May 23, 2003. Sites chosen for testing in September will be
announced by June 2003.
Information: Perpetua Quigley,
Project Coordinator, 613-725-3769 or e-mail:pquigley@cpha.ca
The
Centre For Literacy 3040 Sherbrooke Street West,
Montreal, Quebec H3Z 1A4 Tel: (514) 931-8731 ext. 1415 Fax: (514)
931-5181 www.centreforliteracy.qc.ca
|